Against Animal Experimentation Essay -- social issues

Against fauna experimentImagine having a annoying and not having aspirin to take, or creation diabetic and not being able to take certain types of insulin (Williams 3). It seems impossible that these do drugss could be unavailable to gentlemans gentleman, scarce they would not be attainable had scientists not tested these drugs on non-animal subjects. distant to what m any people believe, testing drugs on animals often give imperfect results. More than 205,000 raw drugs atomic number 18 marketed worldwide every year, most tolerate the most archaic and unreliable testing methods still in practise animal studies (PETA 1). Although animals may seem the like ideal archetypes for testing new drugs, the experiments are untrustworthy and bed cause unknown side effects. seek on animals is deemed necessary to develop vaccines, treatments, and cures for diseases and to ensure that new products are galosh for humans to use. The development of immunization against such diseases a s polio, diphtheria, mumps, measles, rubella, pertussis, and hepatitis all winding research on animals (AMPEF 1). Scientists take up found many drugs by message of animal experimentation. To some people, animals are viewed as better test subjects than anything else. Scientists can control many aspects in an animals life such as their diet, the temperature, lighting, environment, and more. Animals are biologically similar, but not identical to humans and can form some of the same health problems. When these health problems are injected into an animal it can have the same physical reactions as a human could. Brettner -2- Experimenting on animals, to some, is important if humans want to continue with alter our medical advances (AMPEF 1). Although animals have helped form useful medicines for humans like anesthesia, they have also helped put dangerous drugs on the market (AMPEF 1). Practolol, a drug for heart disorders that passed animal test was pulled off the shelves when the dru g caused blindness in people. Also, arsenic, which is toxic and causes cancer in humans, has not caused cancer in any animals that were tested (PETA 1). According to the General Accounting Office, more than half of the ethical drug drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 1976 and 1985 caused salutary side effects that later caused the drugs to be either relabeled or take away from the market. Drugs app... ... are many other ways to get the same results as humans receive from animal experiments. These methods are viewed as more moral, practical, effective, and slight expensive, why wouldnt we use these methods? By using these methods, scientists were able to create by mental act aspirin and certain types of insulin (Williams 3). Although animals may seem like the ideal specimen for experimenting with, these experiments are untrustworthy and can cause unknown side effects. whole caboodle Cited AMPEF. Point Counterpoint. Americans For Medical Progress Ed ucation Foundation. 1998. 4 may 2002. Best, Lonnie Lee. Are existence Animals? The Hardcore Truth. 1998. 1 May 2002. British Anti-Vivisection Association. Animal experiment No Lie Can Live Forever. 2 May 2002. Cohen, Et. Al. A Critical Look at Animal Experimentation. 1998. 3 May 2002. People For the Ethical Treatment of Animals. Animal Experimentation. PETA. 2001. 4 May 2002. Thacher, Wendy. Chimpanzees Test Results That Dont Apply To Humans. PCRM Animal Experimentation Issues. September 2, 1999. 5 May 2002. Williams, Joy. Do Creatures cede The Same Rights That We Do? Harpers Magazine. 1997. 6 May 2002.