Niccolo Machiavellis The Prince Essay -- Machiaveli Prince Power Essa

Niccolo Machiavellis The PrinceNiccolo Machiavellis The Prince examines the nature of government agency and his views of index finger are still fairly in existence today. Ill discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, dual-lane power. While it is possible for power with to attain capitaler prevalence in society, it will not all told eliminate power over. In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses two distinct groups of people, the semipolitical elite, including nobles and opposite princes, and the everyday public. Today in the United States, the first group, the political elite, includes political leaders, religious leaders, business leaders and the leaders of strong lobbying groups. The composition of the general public has changed little from Machiavellis time.Machiavelli concentrates on relations between the prince and the political elite. He claims that ambition and dictat orial power drive most nobles and princes. A prince mustiness act with dictatorial power in order to maintain his position. Machiavelli assumes that shared power will not be effective with nobles, since whether men transport affection figures on themselves, but whether they are afraid will depend on what the ruler does (Machiavelli, p.60-61). Since the nobles are unforgiving and greedy it would be monstrous if not downright suicidal for a prince to rely on their hefty will. Equally strategic, Machiavelli states that a prince, a political leader, has different concerns than the general public. For a prince personal actions, which would be considered immoral or unvirtuous, may save lives or help the princes country. In this way a prince is not immoral, but instead acts with a morality different in nature from the general public. Machiavelli gives several(prenominal) examples of this. Miserliness is considered a fault. Yet, a miserly prince will come to be considered more genero us when it is realized that his revenues are sufficient to defend himself against enemies that violate him, and to undertake campaigns without imposing special taxes on the people (p.56). Likewise, starting a state of war is considered an immoral act by m all. Yet, a prince should not go out troubles to develop in order to avoid fighting a war for wars gage not really be avoided, but are only postponed to the advantage of others (p.11). Avoiding war may ... ... the ugly political process introductory the results has overshadowed positive results like a lower deficit and improved economy. Clinton is uncomplete feared nor loved by his political opposition, making it difficult for him to produce results without great struggles. The one result remembered by many is that Clinton raised taxes, taking outside(a) their property. Thus, Clinton has had difficulty with both appearances and results. One might say that in step-up to power, a prince in relations needs political skill wi th the public. For a politician weaving a sound story of ones accomplishments is more important than the accomplishments themselves.Machiavellis idea of power and how it should be handles as he describes in The Prince can still be used to examine the present. While its possible to decide only the negative uses of power, one can also see the say-so for power to promote the common good. Machiavelli would argue that attending to the common good is in a princes best interests, since it gains the support of the people, something more valuable than any fortress or other expression of power.Works CitedMachiavelli, Niccolo. The Prince. England Penguin Classics, 1981.